Singh, until then an assistant professor, bypassed the stage of associate professor, kumar said. Singh was abvps presidential candidate in the 2004 jnusu polls. Singh was not shortlisted by the ces screening committee because he does not have five published papers in ugc-approved journals However, he was included despite repeated clarifications by the centre, kumar wrote. He said he felt that the responses of many members of the selection Committee were biased in favour of a single candidate. He also objected to the fact that the post of associate professor was not filled. One of the candidates who sat for the interview claimed he was constantly nudged by the v-c to finish. In my presentation, i mentioned an essay that interrogates the idea writing of the aesthetic regime proposed by French philosopher Jacques Ranciere The experts told me that instead of engaging with foreign thinkers, i should concentrate on our own tradition and produce work. One expert directly asked me if I had generated any work on Indian authors. I told him that I had worked on Bangla literature, and published on the early novels of Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay.
On whether Prasad may have been selected because of his ideological leanings, an expert said, we evaluate candidates on the basis of their academic merit. When earlier appointments were made by cpm or cpi, was it not a political appointment? Centre for English Studies, cES held two interviews for professor and associate professor posts on September. None of the experts trunk — maya shankar Pandey from bhu; Shravan Kumar Sharma from Gurukul Kangri vishwavidyalaya, haridwar; and Kamal Mehta from saurashtra University, gujarat — were from the centres panel. Ces chairperson Udaya kumar wrote a dissent note on the day of the interview, objecting to this. The experts were not from the panel approved by the statutory bodies of jnu, he wrote. Kumar also objected to the appointment of Dhananjay singh as professor.
Two candidates who did not make the cut said the panel seemed uninterested in interviewing them. The questions reflected a lack of knowledge of the field. The v-c was not keen on asking questions, he left the interview mid-way, a candidate claimed. Another candidate said the experts looked like they had made up their mind on who they wanted to appoint. When asked about his abvp connection, Prasad told this reporter to call the next day. The following day, when asked about the experts on the selection Committee, he said, Im not the right person to talk about that. Before the question about his appointment could be asked, he disconnected the call.
Thesis in economics jnu
None of the three experts were part of the centres panel. In a visa dissent note to the v-c, two faculty members from the centre, including chairperson Kunal Chakrabarti, wrote that the three — adhya saxena from Baroda University, kapil Kumar from ignou and Aruna sinha from Benaras Hindu University — were not experts in Ancient Indian. Sinha had been in news in September 2017, when the bhu v-c granted her emeritus status despite her department allegedly finding certain parts of her cv fake. The composition of the expert panel is unsuitable as they were not subject experts, the dissent note submitted on September 28 read. However, kumar and Saxena said reviews they had been teaching courses on Ancient India to postgraduate students. Sinha said a response to the dissent note had been sent to the administration.
An expert who did not wish to be named said, If they had objections, they should have got this recorded at the beginning of the selection Committee both of them waited because their candidate was not selected. Objections were also raised about the candidate selected. In their dissent note, the professors wrote, at least four candidates interviewed were far superior to the selected candidate, birendranath Prasad, in source-critiquing ability, analytical skill, domain knowledge, research output Prasad was a student of jnu, and a batchmate said he was an abvp member. Shiv shakti bakshi, executive editor of Kamal Sandesh, said Prasad was his senior and was not actively associated with the abvp. He did his own independent thing. He was academic- minded, not politically active, bakshi said.
Incidentally, in an ac meeting on December 26, 2016, kumar had passed an agenda item that gave him powers to intervene in the list of experts for Selection Committees. This had led to furore, with 20 ac members alleging that the item was not discussed. They had also asked how the v-c could have enough expertise to pick experts for all Centres. The selection Committee comprises the v-c as Chairperson, the three experts, the dean of the School, the Chairperson of the centre, the visitors nominee, and an observer from the sc/ST community. The Indian Express sent a detailed questionnaire to the v-c, marked to rector.
However, repeated reminders seeking answers, as well as a request for an appointment, did not elicit a response. Faculty members who were chairpersons of the six Centres during Soporys time attested to the fact that he was a stickler for rules and did not pick experts from outside the panel. The Indian Express spoke to vidhu verma, chairperson of the centre for Political Studies from 2013-15; Rajat Datta, chairperson of the centre for Historical Studies from 2013-15; Parul dave mukherji, dean of the School of Arts and Aesthetics; Kamal Mitra Chenoy, chairperson of the centre. Jayati Ghosh, former chairperson of the centre for Economic Studies and Planning, recalled only one instance when an expert was called from outside the panel: Somebody backed out at the last moment. Even in that case, sopory called me to ask if that person was okay. Contrast this with the six examples of experts being picked from outside the panels last year: Centre for Historical Studies, the centre held an interview for the post of assistant professor, with specialisation in Ancient Indian History, on September.
Phd thesis on china professional Writing
Kumar took over as v-c on January 28, 2016, while japanese his predecessor, opory, held the post from January 2011-16. He was preceded by hattacharya (2005-11) and hadha (2002-05 both of whom are no more. Sopory said he always stuck to the list of names provided by the centre. I dont know the details but usually we did (nominate) only from names approved by the. I did not put names on my own There is a long list from which you can pick two-three names. The ugc laid down how a selection Committee should be, so we went according to that, he told The Indian Express. Maybe the v-c can take one or two names (from outside the centres panel) but Im not sure if that is permissible under ugc norms.
who gets to pick faculty members ignored, at least five centres of learning. Jawaharlal Nehru, university have spoken out in the past year. The Indian Express tracks how the vice-Chancellors decision to pick experts on his own has become a bone of contention on campus. The jawaharlal Nehru University vice-Chancellor made changes to the composition of the selection Committees — constituted to appoint faculty members — in at least six cases in 2017. In a deviation from the norm, v-c jagadesh Kumar nominated experts from outside the list of names provided by the centre concerned and approved by the Academic council (ac the Indian Express found. In five of the six cases, the centres expressed their disagreement with his decision. According to the 2010 University Grants Commission (UGC) guidelines, recruitment of faculty should be done by duly appointed Selection Committees, which should include three experts in the field concerned nominated by the v-c out of a panel of names approved by the relevant statutory body. However, in at least six of the 30-odd interviews held last year, this was not the case.
He did not answer further questions. Taking exception to what it said was a communal move, the jnusu, said, This grotesque propaganda of Islamophobia in the name of academic courses is problematic. However, ac member Aswini mahapatra said the course was necessary but the name should be changed from Islamic Terrorism to Islamist Terrorism. Islamist Terrorism is a widely accepted term and a globally accepted phenomenon. It is used for those who use Islam for a particular objective. Theres nothing called Hindutva terrorism; that was invented by the congress to pander to the minority vote bank Theres nothing called Christian terrorism best also In India, its basically Islamist terror, whether it is j k or Kerala, so in Indian context, the topic needs. Jnu registrar Pramod Kumar and Rector i chintamani mahapatra did not respond to calls and texts by The Indian Express. For all the latest, education News, download.
Solvezone, jnu -jaipur Services School of Distance
Written by, aranya shankar, new Delhi Updated: may 19, 2018 12:31:11. Decision taken at Academic council meeting. The, jawaharlal Nehru, university is learnt to have given in-principle approval to the study of Islamic Terrorism by a new centre on national security, in an Academic council (AC) meeting held on Friday. Like in the recent past, the meeting was marred by a section of members alleging they were not permitted to speak. Sources said a proposal to set up the centre for National Security Studies (cnss) was given approval, with Islamic Terrorism set to be taught there. While the ac agenda mentions it as one of the key areas of study, there is no clarity so far on whether it would be offered as an independent course. Some ac members, including the jnu students Union office-bearers, said it had been passed as a course. But professor Ajay dubey, who chaired the committee to work out modalities essay of setting up cnss, said no course on the subject had been proposed.