Is it correct that (regarding Bechamp's thesis) you state bacteria and viruses can develop in a proper nutritional medium, for example, in various places of the homework body without having to be seeded there in the first place by previous bacteria or viruses? I do believe that when nutrition is adequate, the tendency for infection must be very much less because i have seen this over and over with my patients, who, when they take large quantities of vitamins, do seem to be healthier and have very much. Hoffer's question may, in part, be found answered in the work of Dubos on the proliferation of microorganisms in vivo. Dubos states: "Spores. Or other clostridia can persist for years in the tissues without causing any symptoms of disease or even multiplying; whereas, they are often brought into activity by non-specific stimuli, such as trauma, surgical intervention, or local infection" (Dubos, 1954). Does this throw a shadow of doubt on current concepts of infection generally and on the value of immunization and the use of antitoxin in particular? We thought so, and subsequently Klenner's article concerning the treatment of poliomyelitis (Klenner, 1955) and lockjaw with vitamin c and tolserol (Klenner, 1954) encouraged us to further re-examine matters in the light of Bechamp's hypothesis. It became increasingly apparent to us that the problems relating to infection and immunization were, to say the least, oversimplified by organized medicine. Perhaps Bechamp was thinking in advance of our modern molecular biologists who refer to genes controlling enzymes!
In this connection he discovered, also, that plant and animal matters contain normally the things which cause them to alter spontaneously, in their cellules. Without the atmospheric germs." It appears to us that not only did Pasteur plagiarize, but he also distorted Bechamp's hypothesis itself which we now offer to our readers in the spirit of continuing inquiry and of encouraging an objective re-evaluation of this man's work. Very briefly, it was Bechamp's thesis that most disease is mattress endogenous in origin or "born" within us and of us in the form of an enzyme transformation. Specifically, bechamp proclaimed that special enzymes, which he called microzymas (soluble ferments under certain conditions may evolve into viral or bacterial entities and that the latter may thus originate from within the organism, without seeding, as a permutation of the endogenous microzymas factors of the. The Blood (Bechamp, 1912 bechamp states: "The microzyma is the beginning and end of all organization. It is the fundamental anatomical element whereby the cellules, the tissues, the organs, the whole of an organism are constituted." ".In a state of health the microzymas act harmoniously and our life is, in every meaning of the word, a regular fermentation. In the condition of disease, the microzymas do not act harmoniously, the fermentation is disturbed, the microzymas have either changed their function or are placed in an abnormal situation by some modification of the medium." Our Work leads Us to correspond with Others Reporting some. 'Abram Hoffer, he replied: "I have enjoyed going over the material you sent me recently, this whole field is very new to me, especially the relationship of bacteria or viruses to nutrition.
It is impossible to fully explain Bechamp's complex hypotheses and findings covering 53 years of dedicated scientific research (1853-1905 and we do urge skeptical readers of our findings and interpretations to study his prolific works. In the year of his death. 1908, eight pages of the moniteur Scientifique were required to set forth a list of his scientific works. Bechamp spoke of his last work. The Blood and Its Third Anatomical Element (Bechamp. 1912 "as the crown to a collection of works upon ferments and fermentation" which he had pursued without relaxation since 1854. On page 79 of this book bechamp gives an interesting account of Pasteur: "Now in 1872. Pasteur attempted his boldest plagiarism; he discovered all of a sudden eight years after my discovery thereof, (I will state elsewhere on what occasion) that the ferments of vineous fermentations exists naturally upon the grape.
Nové elektrochemické techniky pro detekci
In the plan discussion that follows we will endeavor to share with our readers the questions and implications raised by our work with "closed" Australian populations and our review of the history of microbiology. Part I: a supplemental Disease model Background It is generally accepted that if we can establish the presence of a virus or a microorganism with a disease, then that microorganism or virus must be the "cause" of the disease. We perform toxicity tests with laboratory animals and make vaccines which "boost" immunity which theoretically should protect the recipient from the devastating effects of the disease. However, such immunization is not without dangers as has been dramatically shown in the book, every second Child (Kalokerinos, 1974). Indeed, our studies have shown us something quite controversial and phenomenal: namely, that immunization is potentially a health hazard at times and one that organized medicine has not sufficiently examined.
Moreover, immunization might profitably be seen as having stolen the show from a more holistic and nutritionally oriented consideration of a host's susceptibility and resistance factors which our work has shown us to be so critical in disease states and immunization procedures themselves! When our observations first forced us to examine the possibility of immunization being a health hazard, under certain conditions at least, it seemed rather absurd and very puzzling. However, the facts were before us here in closed Australian Aboriginal populations where children and adults have been found suffering all too often with severe and even fatal immunological accidents. As scientists we found ourselves taking a second look at the history of microbiology in order to better understand what we were seeing with our own eyes as a consequence of the mass immunizations conducted among the Aboriginal populations. Louis Pasteur's Place in History? We found in our study of history that there is good evidence that louis Pasteur's position in the history of science may need considerable re-evaluation. Douglas Hume has demonstrated quite conclusively in her book, bechamp or Pasteur (Hume, 1963 that the person who really developed the secrets of fermentation was a little known contemporary medical scientist named Bechamp.
The Closed Mind of Medicine. Cynthia cummings recently visited Australia where she told us of her role in the organ transplant bank at the Institute for Medical Research at San Jose, california. An interesting exchange of ideas resulted where we were reminded of the fact that the average medical graduate does not really get the opportunity to question the validity of much of the medical dogma he is taught, with the result that the seeds of the. We ask at this time that our readers not lose sight of the dogma of organized medicine that all too often blinds us and that you be especially conscious of this fact as you read our findings and speculations. History, of course, is studded with examples of man's reluctance to accept new concepts. Imagine how Columbus must have felt when he "knew" the earth was round while scholarly opinion rejected this notion.
Then, too, what of Galileo who was forced to kneel before the dignitaries of the Church and denounce his "heresy" concerning the movement of the earth. Moreover, it was 35 years before the work of Mendel was accepted, while another scientist by the name of Waterson was told by a referee of the royal Society that his thesis on molecular gases was nothing but nonsense! An Australia experience some seven years have now elapsed since ve jointly commenced researching the role of ascorbic acid specifically and good nutrition generally in the treatment of Australian Aborigines. Throughout, Irwin Stone's outstanding work has helped us practically and his example of bold inquiry has proven a constant source of spiritual support as well. We often found ourselves borrowing from his courage to stand for what he believes as we struggled to be heard above the rigid drums of orthodox medicine in Australia and elsewhere. Stone's work and example have also encouraged us to turn back the pages of history to better understand our own orthomolecular work with the problems of Aboriginal infant mortality generally and with immunizations specifically. In so doing we have uncovered two controversial issues: (1) an interpretative one, (2) one that involves directly the fields of immunology and nutrition.
Charakterizace plazmidů přenášejících rezistence
The following findings and speculations have grown out of dissertation our joint study of Aboriginal infant mortality in Australia associated with immunizations meant to save them, and out of our findings concerning the value of megascorbic therapy, specifically, and of orthomolecular medicine, generally, as treatment approaches. We are not surprised that the editor of this journal was initially reluctant to accept our earlier manuscripts for publication due both to their lack of documentation and highly speculative nature. In addition to the editors of the jiapm we would also like to express our gratitude to Mrs. Dorothy Knafelc, frms, who first introduced us to the work of Bechamp, and who is presently assembling the relevant arguments and evidence for a serious consideration of Bechamp's work by contemporary biologists. We recognize the leadership of the International Academy of Preventive medicine in the holistic health care reform movement in the world today and welcome this opportunity to share our thinking and work with its members. We have already been corresponding with some iapm members for some time now, among them. Irwin Stone, linus pauling and Frederick Klenner. These men have offered us encouragement in our work in Australia where we are endeavoring to organize a chapter of the iapm to promote the practice of Orthomolecular Medicine.
It soon became obvious that individuals became susceptible to disease for various reasons, and the germs themselves simply take advantage of the susceptible state. Vaccinating susceptible individuals does not necessarily render them immune it may have the reverse effect. Further light was shed on this problem when it was found that Pasteur plagiarised the work of a great scientific contemporary, bechamp. According to this astute observer the basis of life is not the cell but a living "gene" that he called a microzyma. Microzymas can evolve with changes in the nutritional environment to become viruses or bacteria, harmless or harmful and although apparently specific viruses and bacteria can be reproduced as similar organisms, this is only true if specific environmental conditions exist. Under other friend conditions evolution into other viruses and bacteria can take place. In the same way an infection can be exogenous but it it can also be endogenous - evolving by a process of microzymian evolution. The fallacy of vaccines is thus explained and the importance of the nutritional environment of the cell understood. Ascorbic acid, the universal detoxifier and tolerance factor, can be placed in its true position as an important weapon against disease.
a modified autogenous vaccine. He is a life fellow of the royal Society for health (London). Life fellow of the royal Microscopical Society, fellow of the Institute of Science technology (U.K. fellow of the australasian College of biomedical Scientists, fellow of the hong Kong Medical Technology Association, member of the International Academy of Preventive medicine, the new York Academy of Sciences, australian Institute of Medical Technology and American Society of Medical Technologists. Dettman has authored many scientific papers and was appointed the head of a research team in 1969 to investigate the claims. Kalokerinos with whom he has been a co-worker ever since. Modern medicine is based on, pasteur's germ theory of disease-a specific organism causes a specific disease and a specific vaccine gives specific protection. Shades of doubt concerning the validity of this dogma were seen when it was observed that some Aboriginal children did not get protection and, in fact, died when vaccines were administered.
Smallpox, measles, rubella, tuberculosis, diphtheria, poliomyelitis, part iii disease and Bechamp's Hypothesis: a final Consideration. The kitten Experiment, conclusion, acknowledgment, references, recommended reading. Kalokerinos took his medical degree from Sydney university in 1951 and then spent six years in England. On his return to australia he was appointed Medical Superintendent of Collarenebri hospital where he served until 1975. He is a life fellow of the royal Society for health, a fellow of the australasian College of biomedical Scientists, a fellow of the hong Kong Medical Technology Association, a member of the International Academy of Preventive medicine and of the new York Academy. Kalokerinos has authored a book with profound orthomolecular medicine implications entitled every second Child as well summary as many scientific papers. He is also the author of two books on the subject of opal on which he is considered an international authority. Dettman is founder and Director of the oakleigh Pathology service and Orthomolecular Medisearch of Mentone, australia. He served with the.
Eva podholová - ústav technologie vody a prostředí
Second thoughts on disease, a controversy and Bechamp revisited by, drs, kalokerinos dettman 1977. The Closed Mind of Medicine, an Australia experience, part upplemental Disease model. Background, louis review Pasteur's Place in History? What Is a microzyma? Our Work leads Us to correspond with Others. A new Spirit of Inquiry, part ii immunization Reconsidered, introduction. Antibiotics, Immunization or Improved Nutrition?